Every day, we get calls from teams that have been told “AI will fix it” and often the promise comes with a laundry list of experiments, proofs of concept, and unclear ownership. We take a different path.
AI with a clear business case.
Keeping automation grounded
Only when it helps the person on the screen
Our founder has lived through decades of math-driven automation and machine learning in Dynamics 365, Azure, and Power Platform. To us, AI is not a new flight of fancy; it is a mature toolset we can pull out after we have documented the business problem.
So before we ever talk about copilots or predictive scoring, we first answer: What will this save? Which compliance touchpoint does it protect? How will the end user experience improve? If we can’t answer that clearly, the idea stays on the shelf.
We do the heavy lifting without breaking what’s already working
Complex Dynamics and Azure landscapes already carry enough risk. Our job is to keep them running. That means we only add machine learning where we can embed it into existing processes, keep the systems governor-friendly, and communicate every step in simple business language. We map the current state, identify the exposures, and present a short plan so leadership sees progress each week. That plan includes the AI bits, but they only stay if they measurably reduce manual work, tighten compliance, or trim license waste.
Accountability, not experimentation
Every AI automation we ship comes with named ownership, a set of measurable results, and a rollback path. We do not test “on the customer.” We pilot with explicit sign-off, track the before/after metrics, and report outcomes to the people who need to sign off on compliance. That disciplined approach is why CFOs, CIOs, and IT directors return to us when their projects are stalling.
Example outcome we aim for
We typically rescue Dynamics rollouts with 10+ years of founder-level experience, reclaiming 20–30% of license spend, and delivering audit-ready controls in less than 30 days. When AI plays a role, it is because we needed an automation layer to keep those savings consistent. Never because the technology itself sounded cool.
Let’s talk about the next right automation
If your Dynamics 365 or Azure program feels unclear, compliance-heavy, or stretched too thin, let’s walk through it together. We’ll map the current risks, explain whether machine learning should be part of the solution, and keep everything accountable to your board report.
Share the post:
Get In touch
Get an AI value review
A practical review to assess where AI can create real value in your organization and where it shouldn’t.
Other articles
Enterprise AI copilot for licensing – PU47 release brief
CloudERP’s Enterprise AI Copilot is a premium add-on to License Trimmer, that becomes generally available with Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations Platform Update 47 (PU47).
The one dashboard CFO's need to control Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O license spend
If you have ever tried to answer, “What are we paying per Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations user?” you know the pain.
Procurement’s fastest route to Dynamics 365 savings
Procurement leaders are under pressure to find savings even as Microsoft licensing grows more complex. The good news: a handful of procurement-owned actions can unlock double-digit savings without touching code.