Compliance talk often turns into a sprint of controls, auditors, and checklists. We try to keep it rooted in what the operators actually do.
Compliance talk often turns into a sprint of controls, auditors, and checklists. We try to keep it rooted in what the operators actually do.
Start by mapping out the processes that matter most: finance close, batch releases, quality sign-offs. When those are visible, it is easier to see if Dynamics changes negatively affect them.
Dynamics 365, Azure, and the Power Platform already have logs, approvals, and automation. We pair them with a simple checklist (“who approves?”, “what gets logged?”, “how do we reset access?”) and we only add new controls when there is a genuine gap.
Compliance status should read like a short story, not a technical report. We write weekly updates that describe what was protected, what risk decreased, and what still requires attention. This approach keeps the team focused on results, not jargon. If you want a down-to-earth compliance review, no sales, just a conversation. Let’s have one.
A short, focused review to help you understand where your Dynamics 365 compliance stands and what to address next.
Every day, we get calls from teams that have been told “AI will fix it” and often the promise comes with a laundry list of experiments, proofs of concept, and unclear ownership. We take a different path.
Microsoft’s latest change to Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations licensing enforcement looks like a reprieve at first glance. But it is not a simple price change.
Procurement leaders are under pressure to find savings even as Microsoft licensing grows more complex. The good news: a handful of procurement-owned actions can unlock double-digit savings without touching code.